Different Vocabulary Choices and Expressions of Male and Female Bilinguals in Daily Conversations at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ybzcwr57Keywords:
Communication, Bilingual, Vocabulary selection, Social.Abstract
This study explores gender differences in vocabulary selection and communicative expression among bilingual students at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China. By analyzing naturally occurring English-Chinese bilingual dialogues of eight participants, this study explores how gender and life experiences influence language use in informal settings. Through qualitative coding and frequency analysis, the research results indicate that male bilinguals tend to use task-oriented, evaluative, and technical vocabulary, while female bilinguals tend to use cooperative, relational, and detail-oriented expressions. Transgender dialogue also demonstrates role asymmetry and different discourse strategies. In addition, the differences between same-sex groups with different life experiences highlight the influence of personal background on language style. These findings suggest that bilingual communication is influenced not only by gender but also by contextual and experiential factors. This study emphasizes the complex interweaving between identity, language use, and social background, while also acknowledging the limitations related to sample size and ecological validity, thus contributing to gender and bilingual research.
Downloads
References
[1] Cameron, D. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus: Do men and women really speak different languages? Oxford University Press.
[2] Coates, J. (1993). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. 2nd ed. London: Longman.
[3] Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Emotions in multiple languages. Palgrave Macmillan.
[4] Gao, L. (2006). Language contact and convergence in computer-mediated communication. World Englishes, 25 (3–4), 299–308.
[5] Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Harvard University Press.
[6] Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Blackwell Publishing.
[7] Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
[8] Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
[9] Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women's Place. New York: Harper & Row.
[10] Pavlenko, A. (2004). Gender and sexuality in foreign and second language education: Critical and feminist approaches. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (pp. 53–71). Chapter 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[11] Rayo, W., Barrita, A., Martinez, L., & Carbajal, I. (2024). The complexity in bilingual code switching research: A systematic review. Languages, 9 (6), 217.
[12] Romaine, S. (1999). Communicating gender. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[13] Salsabila, I., Umam, A., Nurjanah, A., Wahyuningsih, O., & Lestari, A. A. D. (2024). The role of gender in language and communication: A linguistic perspective. Eduvest: Journal of Universal Studies, 4 (1), 260–269. [14] Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.
[14] WEI, L. (2002). 'What do you want me to say?' On the Conversation Analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society, 31 (2), 159–180.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
