The influence and significance of theory in second language teaching application: Taking Krashen's Input Hypothesis as an Example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/yzcvfq14Keywords:
Krashen's Input Hypothesis, second language teaching, theory, positive impacts and limitations.Abstract
The application of theory in second language teaching has received widespread attention, but teachers still have shortcomings in combining theory with practice. This article analyzes the application of Krashen's Input Hypothesis in second language teaching, including its positive impacts and limitations. This study found that the application of theory in second language teaching is more profound than before. Theory provides important reference value for second language teaching. However, this study also found that there are still shortcomings in the application of this theory. This article analyzes that in the process of second language teaching, teachers should integrate theory with other theories, consider the combination of input and output, and optimize teaching modes based on individual differences. Based on this, this article will take the Krashen Input Hypothesis as an example to provide relevant suggestions for the theoretical application in second language teaching.
Downloads
References
[1] Bai, Y. 2009. Krashen's "Input Hypothesis" and "Emotion Filtering Hypothesis" theory and public foreign language listening and speaking teaching in universities. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business (06): 122-125.
[2] Chen, Y. 2011. Cognitive analysis of Krashen's input and emotion filtering hypothesis. Hunan Social Sciences (03): 183-185.
[3] Chen, F. 2017. From the perspective of input-output theory, English listening and speaking teaching in universities. Education Review (09): 128-133.
[4] Deng, Y. & Guo, Y. 2010. The application of Input and Output Hypothesis Theory in English audio-visual speaking teaching. Journal of Education Science, Hunan Normal University (06): 109-111.
[5] Dong, W. & Cao, G. 2023. On the advancement and practice of Krashen's Hypothesis Theory in college English teaching. Education Journal (9).
[6] Hu, F., Cheng, N. & Wang, H. 2010. Discussing English reading graded teaching from the perspective of the "Double Hypothesis Theory". Teaching and Management (12): 120-121.
[7] Jamilah, M. A. 2024. Acquired versus learned systems in second language acquisition: A review of studies based on Krashen's Hypothesis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies (1): 177-185.
[8] Kang, J. 2008. The enlightenment of Input Hypothesis on adult foreign language teaching. Adult Education in China (08): 182-183.
[9] Li, P. 2009. An analysis of Krashen's theory of second language acquisition. Journal of the School of International Relations (05): 90-96.
[10] Li, M. 2013. Create a second classroom for college English guided by the Krashen Input Hypothesis theory. Adult Education in China (05): 148-149.
[11] Lichtman, K. & VanPatten, B. 2021. Krashen forty years later: Final comments. Foreign Language Annals (2): 336-340.
[12] Wang, B. 2015. The influence of Krashen's Second Language Acquisition Theory on bilingual. Teaching Theory and Modernization (04): 113-117.
[13] Wei, Q. 2020. Krashen's "Monitoring Theory" and analysis of recitation strategies in English teaching in China. Journal of Chinese Education (S1): 87-89.
[14] Wen, L. & Wei, L. 2019. A Critical Evaluation of Krashen's Monitor Model. Theory and Practice in Language Studies (11): 1459-1464.
[15] Xiong, X. & Yang, Q. 2014. The application of Language Input Hypothesis and Emotion Filtering Hypothesis in English teaching. Adult Education in China (13): 155-158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
