Reconstructing the “Looking-Glass Self” in the Algorithmic Era: A Social Psychological Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zvb2xk40Keywords:
Looking-glass Self, Social Psychology, Algorithmic Gaze, Technological Empathy, Digital IdentityAbstract
In the era of social media and artificial intelligence, human self-identity and emotional cognition are increasingly influenced by algorithmic mechanisms. This study re-examines Cooley's "looking glass self theory" from the perspective of social psychology, exploring how the interaction between digital platforms and artificial intelligence reconstructs the relationship between the self and "the other". The research takes the "Subject Three" dance challenge on Douyin and the artificial intelligence interaction based on ChatGPT as cases, and adopts the research method of theoretical literature analysis and case observation. Research has found that algorithmic feedback and data quantification have replaced traditional social evaluation, forming a new "mirror field" where self-awareness is mediated by digital visibility and emotional algorithms. These processes generate both short-term satisfaction and long-term anxiety, reshaping users' emotional regulation and identity stability. Furthermore, the research also found that the emergence of "AI empathy", that is, human-computer interaction can simulate emotional reciprocity and cultivate new forms of attachment. However, this study is limited by its qualitative scope and focus on the context of Chinese social media, indicating that future cross-cultural and empirical research on algorithmic self and emotional adaptation is needed.
Downloads
References
[1] Loveys, K., Sagar, M., & Broadbent, E. (2020). The effect of multimodal emotional expression on responses to a digital human during a self-disclosure conversation: a computational analysis of user language. Journal of medical systems, 44(9), 143.
[2] Nungesser, F. (2022). Charles Horton Cooley: Human Nature and the Social Order. InSchlüsselwerke der Emotionssoziologie (pp. 87-102). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
[3] Burkitt, I. (2008). Social selves: Theories of self and society.
[4] Basir, F. (2023). The algorithmic gaze: Surveillance, privacy, and the future of social interaction. Research Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 45–58.
[5] Qiu, X., Qu, W., Feng, T., & Zhu, X. (2025). Semiotic Fracturing of Rural Cultural Symbols in Short Video Ecosystems: A Critical Discourse Analysis of “Tǔ Wèi” Labeling and Cultural Subjectivity Construction. Social Sciences,14(8), 494.
[6] Jones, J. M. (2020). The looking-glass lens: Self-concept changes due to social media practices. Journal of Social Media Studies, 2(1), 1–18.
[7] Bansal, G., Chamola, V., Hussain, A., Guizani, M., & Niyato, D. (2024). Transforming conversations with AI--A comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation,16(5), 2487-2510.
[8] Rawat, P., Bajaj, M., Vats, S., & Sharma, V. (2024). Redefining Human-AI Interactions: Unveiling ChatGPT's Profound Emotional Understanding. InA Practitioner's Approach to Problem-Solving using AI (pp. 1-19). Bentham Science Publishers.
[9] Joseph, J. (2025). The algorithmic self: how AI is reshaping human identity, introspection, and agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645795.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









