Emotional AI as Psychological Support: Functional Limitations and the Reshaping of Relational ExpectationsScoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/2hcyvp15Keywords:
Emotional AI; Mental health chatbots; Conversational agents; Therapeutic relationship; Help-seeking; Scoping review.Abstract
Artificial intelligence chatbots and conversational agents are being used more and more often to provide emotional support in mental health. A scoping review of interdisciplinary studies published from 2018 to 2025 was conducted to identify structural and functional deficiencies in emotional AI for mental health support. Five connected thematic deficiencies have been identified: a predictive rather than an interpretive understanding, instability of the long-term dialogic context, absence of clinical authority and accountability, affirmation-oriented interaction design, and the perceived sufficiency of AI support. These topics are then related to user experience and, considering emotion, relationship expectations, and professional help-seeking, interpreted. Although emotional AI is more readily available for people, it also has some drawbacks; thus, people's expectations of emotional support may be reshaped, and they may fail to receive timely professional help. Implications for research, clinical practice and system design are proposed.
Downloads
References
[1] Abd-Alrazaq A A, Rababeh A, Alajlani M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of using chatbots to improve mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2020, 22(7): e16021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/16021
[2] D’Alfonso S. AI in mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2020, 36: 112-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.005
[3] Bender E M, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, et al. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21), 2021: 610-623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
[4] Fiske A, Henningsen P, Buyx A. Your robot therapist will see you now: ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2019, 21(5): e13216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/13216
[5] Laranjo L, Dunn A G, Tong H L, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2018, 25(9): 1248-1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy072
[6] Liu N F, Lin K, Hewitt J, et al. Lost in the middle: how language models use long contexts. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024, 12: 157-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00638
[7] Norcross J C, Lambert M J, eds. Psychotherapy relationships that work: Volume 1: Evidence-based therapist contributions. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190843953.003.0001
[8] Jacob C, Kerrigan P, Bastos M T. The chat-chamber effect: trusting the AI hallucination. Big Data & Society, 2025, 12(1): 20539517241306345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241306345
[9] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: treatment and management (NICE guideline NG222). 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
