A Comparative Analysis of Eugene Nida's and Peter Newmark's Perspectives on Cultural Context in Translation

Authors

  • Rui Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hkm7qj64

Keywords:

Eugene Nida, Peter Newmark, Comparative Analysis, Cultural Context

Abstract

Translation, as a bridge between languages and cultures, is a complex and engaging field. The task of a translator goes beyond mere linguistic conversion; it involves the intricate process of transferring cultural contexts and meanings from one language to another. A review of Western translation history reveals a rich diversity of translation thoughts and a multitude of distinctive translators. Among them, two influential figures in the Western translation world, Eugene Nida and Peter Newmark, introduced renowned concepts such as functional equivalence, communicative translation, and semantic translation. These scholars have extensively studied translation theory, contributing significantly to the flourishing development of Western translation circles. This paper aims to comparatively analyze the thoughts of these two translation theorists from different dimensions, offering an analysis of the similarities and differences in perspectives on cultural context in translation and discussing implications for modern translation education. The following sections will provide a detailed discussion of this topic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CHAI Su & GUO Zhiyou. (2022). A Study on the Translation Techniques of Long Sentences in the Science of Fairy Tales Under Newmark’s Communicative Translation Theory. Canadian Social Science (1), 1-12.

Ziling Zuo. (2021). Subtitle Translation of “MFA Presenting Chinese Province” from the Perspective of Communicative Translation. Journal of Educational Research and Policies (6),

Qianqian HU & Su CHAI. (2020). A Study on the Techniques of the E-C Long-Sentence Translation in Our Wealth Is Loving Each Other: Self and Society in Fiji under the Theory of Communicative Translation. Canadian Social Science (2), 43-49.

ZHAO Yuying. (2019). A Comparison of the Translation Theories of Nida and Newmark—Taking the Translation of Nature as What We See as a Case Study. Translating China (1.0).

Yu Liwen. (2015). Research on the Business English Translation Methodology under the Perspective of Dynamic Cultural Equivalence. (eds.)

Xiuping Geng. (2014). Eugene A. Nida vs. Peter Newmark--A Dichotomy Comparison. (eds.) Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Psychology and Public Health (PPH 2014) Volume 4 (pp.37-41). Foreign Language & Literature Department of Baoji Arts & Science University.

Banafsheh Ghafel, Abbass Eslami Rasekh & Abdolreza Pazhakh. (2011). Idiomatic Expressions of the Sewing Frame in English and their Persian Counterparts: Nida's Dynamic Equivalence Theory in Focus. International Education Studies (2), 160.

(2008). A Study of Korean Translations of Paradise Lost using Eugene Nida's Formal and Dynamic Equivalence Theories of Translation. The Journal of Modern British & American Language & Literature (1), 133-155.

E. Earle Ellis. (2003). Dynamic Equivalence Theory, Feminist Ideology and Three Recent Bible Translations. The Expository Times (1), 7-12.

Downloads

Published

10-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, R. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Eugene Nida’s and Peter Newmark’s Perspectives on Cultural Context in Translation. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 6(3), 106-112. https://doi.org/10.54097/hkm7qj64