Study on the Changes in College Students' Learning Behaviors under ChatGPT-based Interventions: A Case Study of Hunan University of Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/w73f9694Keywords:
ChatGPT, ‘ChatGPT+Education’, Higher Education, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence, exemplified by ChatGPT, has garnered significant attention from the global technology community. Scholars suggest that this technology could lead to profound transformations in areas such as education and research. As digital information continues to evolve, the disruption of traditional educational models by AI-driven innovations appears to be an inevitable progression. This study aims to explore whether generative AI facilitates or impedes the development of education, its impact on traditional offline educational models, and its potential to enhance student learning outcomes. Utilizing sampling techniques, surveys, data mining, convolutional neural networks, and logistic regression, this research systematically investigates and critically analyzes college students' perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of ChatGPT compared to conventional learning methods, the degree of its influence, and potential future implications.
Downloads
References
[1] XIA, L., YANG, Z., HUANG, R., et al. (2023). Digitization of Education and Educational Change in the New Era (PEN Talk). Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 62(05), 1-22.
[2] JIA, T., & CAI, J. (2024). The change of generative artificial intelligence on educational productivity. Modern Educational Technology, 34(01), 107-116.
[3] LU, Y., YU, J., CHEN, P., et al. (2023). Educational Applications and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence--Taking ChatGPT System as an Example. China Distance Education, 43(04), 24-31+51.
[4] WANG, Y., LI, S., & HUANG, R. (2024). Research on the application of blended teaching mode combining online and offline--Taking higher mathematics course as an example. China Education Technology Equipment, (01), 96-100.
[5] ZHAO, L., CUI, R., JIANG, H., et al. (2023). Research on the deep integration of information technology and higher education teaching. Journal of Anhui Electronic Information Vocational and Technical College, 22(03), 95-98.
[6] JIAO, J. (2023). ChatGPT Boosts Digital Transformation of School Education-What to Learn and How to Teach in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. China Distance Education, 43(04), 16-23.
[7] PAN, Y., QI, W., & WANG, J. (2024). The application of generative artificial intelligence in the education of college students. Internet Weekly, (04), 62-64.
[8] WANSHENG, J., & ZI, T. (2023). Prospects and constraints of ChatGPT in the development of higher education. Beijing Education (Higher Education), (08), 4-9.
[9] WANG, S. (2024). Obstacles and Countermeasures of Generative Artificial Intelligence to the Governance of Academic Misconduct. Science Research, 42(07), 1361-1368.
[10] LIU, S. Y. (2023). A preliminary study of the impact of generative artificial intelligence on higher education. China Journal of Multimedia and Network Teaching (Lenten Edition), (12), 1-4.
[11] HE, C., & XIONG, H. (2024). ChatGPT Class Generative Artificial Intelligence Educational Ethical Crisis and Its Response. China Education Informatization, 30(02), 81-90.
[12] ZHANG, L., ZHOU, L., & ZHAO, L. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence Educational Application Risks and Their Avoidance - Based on the Perspective of Educational Subjectivity. Open Education Research, 29(05), 47-53.
[13] SUN, D., ZHU, C., XU, Z., & XU, G. (2024). A study on the analysis of college students' programming learning behavior based on generative artificial intelligence. Research on Electrochemical Education, 45(03), 113-120.
[14] HU, Q., WU, W., FENG, G., PAN, T., CHEN, Z., & QIU, K. (2021). Key technology and practice of teaching evaluation in higher education in the era of artificial intelligence. Open Education Research, 27(05), 15-23.
[15] HU, L., WANG, K., & GAO, X. (2020). The Should-be and Real Way of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Education and Teaching. Teaching and Management, (28), 5-8.
[16] LIU, H., LI, S., JIANG, Q., & ZHAO, W. (2020). Connotation Transformation, Constraint Bottleneck and Development Path of Self-Regulated Learning Empowered by Intelligent Technology. Journal of Distance Education, 38(04), 105-112.
[17] KONG, W., HAN, S., & ZHANG, Z. (2020). Adaptive Learning Path Construction with Artificial Intelligence Support. Modern Distance Education Research, 32(03), 94-103.
[18] GU, X., SHU, H., & BAI, X. (2018). Teacher tools in the age of intelligence: Awakening data intelligence in learning design tools. Open Education Research, 24(05), 64-72.
[19] YU, M. H., FENG, X., & ZHU, Z. (2017). Exploration of educational application and innovation of machine learning under the perspective of artificial intelligence. Journal of Distance Education, 35(03), 11-21.
[20] MOU, Z. (2017). Rethinking and unraveling personalized learning theory in the era of “Artificial Intelligence +”. Journal of Distance Education, 35(03), 22-30.G. O. Young, “Synthetic structure of industrial plastics (Book style with paper title and editor),” in Plastics, 2nd ed. vol. 3, J. Peters, Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, pp. 15–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.