Gain and Loss: An Analysis of the English Translation of Chinese Ci from the Perspective of SDRT Theory

Authors

  • Wuxi Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/f8mayj62

Keywords:

Personal Reference, Zero-anaphora, Chinese Ci, SDRT, Translation Strategy

Abstract

Chinese Ci, a classical Song Dynasty lyric genre, relies heavily on syntactic economy and zero anaphora (ZA) to achieve a compact and highly accessible coherence grounded in vivid imagery and shared scene schemas. This implicit mode of cohesion stands in tension with Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT), especially its Right Frontier Constraint (RFC), which expects explicit, accessible referents for coherent discourse attachment. Using Su Shi’s “Riverside Town” (1075) and Xu Yuanchong’s English translation as a case study, this paper demonstrated that translating Ci into English necessitates inserting overt pronouns, connectives, and subordinate clauses to “repair” the implicit references. These changes alter the discourse structure of the poem, increase RFC compliance and resolve attachment ambiguities, but at the cost of narrowing the poem’s aesthetic openness and imaginative space. The analysis highlights a fundamental trade-off in classical Chinese poetry translation—a gain in clarity and cohesion versus a loss in subtlety and interpretive freedom—and underlines the need for translation strategies that balance logical coherence with poetic integrity. This research thus offered valuable insights for translation practice, illuminating the inherent yet necessary trade-offs in bridging profound cultural and poetic divides.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liang, T. (1996). Topic continuity and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse: Cognitive strategies in discourse processing [A]. Studies in Anaphora (edited by Barbara Fox) [C].1996.

[2] Zhao, H. (2006). A Comparison of Person Anaphora in Chinese Metrical Poetry and Its English Translations [in Chinese] Foreign Language Education, (4), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1023/h.2006.04.010.

[3] Liu, X. (2022). On the English translation of missing narrative subjects in classical Chinese poetry [in Chinese]. Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation, 6(36), 47–51.

[4] Blum-Kulka, S. (1986). Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation. In J. House, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Gunter Narr.

[5] Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.

[6] Li, C., & Thompson, S. A. (1979). Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. Syntax and Semantics, 12.

[7] Ariel, M. (1988). Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, 24.

[8] Miao, X. (2003). A survey of Centering Theory in discourse. Contemporary Linguistics, (2), 149–157, 190.

[9] Chen, P. (1987). Discourse analysis of Zero Anaphora in Chinese [in Chinese], Chinese Language, (05).

[10] Xu, Y. (2011). 300 Song Lyrics Translated by Xu Yuanchong. China Intercontinental Press.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles