Copyright Protection for AI-general Works: Dilemmas and Strategies

Authors

  • Yanfei Lei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/5dncfq97

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Copyright, Institutional Obstacle

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has led to the creation of numerous online works generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) on various platforms. The emergence of these works brings about challenges to traditional copyright protection. Traditional copyright aims to protect the legitimate rights and interests that individuals enjoy over their intellectual achievements, while AI mainly relies on algorithms. Issues such as the ownership of rights, infringement determination, and the degree of protection of works all need to be addressed. This review explores the copyright disputes involved in works generated by AI, including compliance issues, ownership issues and infringement determination. Moreover, corresponding feasible countermeasures for such issues will be discussed. Under no circumstances should the creation of works be based on laws. Nowadays, a work cannot exist independently without the support of vast amounts of data. Clearly distinguishing the attributes of works generated by AI plays an important role. This not only promotes the improvement of the legal theoretical framework in the field of intellectual property rights under the impact of AI, but also protects the legitimate rights of authors. And it conforms to the trend of the law and big data keeping pace with modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Hegel: Principles of the Philosophy of Right, translated by Fan Yang and Zhang Qitai, Business Press, 2011, p. 60. [in Chinese]

[2] VAN DIS E A M, BOLLEN J, ZUIDEMA W, et al. 2023. ChatGPT: Five priorities for research[J]. Nature, 614(7947): 224-226.

[3] Yinliang Liu: "On the Legal Status of Copyright for Artificial Intelligence Works", Political and Legal Affairs, No. 3, 2020, p. 5. [in Chinese]

[4] Shan Sun: "The Dilemma and Solution of Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Content", Intellectual Property, No. 11, 2018, p. 65. [in Chinese]

[5] Jani McCutcheon. 2013. The Vanishing Author in Computer-Generated Works: A Critical Analysis of Recent Australian Caselaw, Mellbourne University Law Review, vol.36, no. 3.

[6] HADERO H, BAUDER D. The New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft for Using its Stories to Train Chatbots [EB/OL]. (2023-12-28) [2024-09-18]. https://apnews.com/article/nyt-new-york-times-openai-microsoft-6ea53a8ad3efa06ee4643b697df0ba57.

[7] Abraham Drassinower. 2015. What’s Wrong with Copying?. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 87-88.

[8] Intellectual Property Office of United Kingdom. 2013. Modern Copyright: A Modern, Robust ang Flexible Framework.p.36.

[9] Wikipedia. Richtlinie 2006/116/EG (Schutzdauer des Urheber-rechts und verwandter Schutzrechte) [EB/ OL]. [2025-02-26]. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Richtlinie_2006/116/ EG_ (Schutzdauer_ des_ Urheberrechts_ und_verwandter_Schutzrechte).

[10] Wenge Zheng: "The Responsibility Path for the Construction of Legal Subjects in Artificial Intelligence", China Applied Law, No. 5, 2022, pp. 225-226. [in Chinese]

[11] MarkA. Lemley, "IP inaWorldWithout Scarcity", NewYorkUniversityLawReview, Vol.90, No.2(May, 2015), p.460.

[12] Linhart A, Schumacher P, Zech H. Schutz trainierter KI vs. Transparenzpflichten - Ein Spannungsverhältnis [J]. Zeitschrift fr Urheber- und Medienrecht, 2024, 68(4): 237-243.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles