Construction of a "Three Dimensions, Four Stages, Five Enhancements" Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training System for Information Security Majors Under the Background of Emerging Engineering Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/9vpeza42Keywords:
Emerging Engineering Education, Information Security Major, Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training, Three Dimensions, Four Stages, Five Enhancements, Talent Training SystemAbstract
Emerging engineering education prioritizes industry-education integration, interdisciplinary innovation and practical training, which fits the national cybersecurity strategy’s need for interdisciplinary information security talents. Nevertheless, the current innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E) training for information security majors in Xinjiang suffers from fragmented procedures, unsystematic progressive design and unclear training goals. Such drawbacks fail to satisfy the talent demands of emerging fields such as zero-trust security and industrial internet security. Guided by emerging engineering education concepts, this study adopts constructivism and competency-based education theories alongside industry-education integration principles to construct a closed-loop I&E training system with three-dimensional linkage, four-stage progression and five-dimensional improvement. It elaborates the system’s framework, core connotations and operational mechanisms, and proposes three training paths: expanded knowledge teaching, practice-driven competency enhancement, and project-based I&E cultivation. This paper designs a four-stage training chain of awareness, initiation, practice and incubation, and defines five core objectives covering innovative awareness, thinking, spirit, practical ability and achievement transformation. This research provides theoretical references and a feasible paradigm for the I&E training of information security majors in local universities.
Downloads
References
[1] Caneva, C. (2026). Modelling with purpose: From ambiguity to impact in instructional coaching for digital education. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 15(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2026-0027.
[2] Gao, Y., Zhu, L., & Tian, M. (2026). Retraction note: SWOT analysis of the application of three digital media in OLPE physical education teaching: Edmodo, Zoom, and Google Meet. BMC Medical Education, 26(1), 765. https://doi.org/ 10. 1186/s12909-026-08912-3.
[3] Zhang, H. (2026). Research on the compatibility and implementation mechanisms of deep integration between physical education teaching and artificial intelligence. Education Insights, 3(5), 62–72.
[4] Li, G., Hao, Y., Li, X., et al. (2026). Exploration and application research of DeepSeek in physical education teaching. Education Insights, 3(5), 55–61.
[5] Huiguo, F., Xiang, L., & Dongnan, C. (2026). Accurate calibration of physical education teaching action based on artificial intelligence deep learning technology. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.4018/ IJWLTT. 398761.
[6] Gallardo, P. D. C., Beltrán, P. B., Miralles, G. E., et al. (2026). Visualizing legal reasoning in AI-mediated contexts: Flowcharts as pedagogical tools in legal education. Human Arenas, 1–18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education and Educational Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









