To Gen-AI or not to Gen-AI: Sensory-Economic Framework for Aligning Post-secondary Education with an AI-Transformed Labor Market

Authors

  • Yitao Wang School of Beijing-Dublin International College, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/2xxwdp57

Keywords:

Generative AI, Task Digitalization, Sensory Resistance, Career Segments, Educational Policy.

Abstract

Generative AI is restructuring labor markets, challenging post-secondary institutions to adapt curricula. This paper develops the GRASP Framework, predicting occupation-specific AI penetration and generating curriculum optimization strategies. Grounded in O*NET data, PULSE forecasts labor demand evolution via a Sensory Resistance Coefficient establishing automation ceilings; CALIBER employs constrained Cobb-Douglas optimization for curriculum transitions. Three career segments are examined: Library Music Producers (Berklee), Gameplay Programmers (USC), and Full-Service Chefs (CIA). Extending beyond employment, COMPASS maps eighteen occupations onto a strategy space of sensory resistance and demand elasticity, classifying careers into Sanctuary, Augmentation, and Pivot zones. The primary innovation disaggregates occupation-level analysis into career segments, revealing within-occupation variation obscured by aggregate assessments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] International Labour Organization. Generative ai and jobs: A refined global index of occupational exposure. ILO Working Paper 140, 2025.

[2] Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo. The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6):1488–1542, 2018. doi:10.1257/aer.20160696.

[3] Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo. Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2):3–30, 2019. doi:10.1257/jep.33.2.3.

[4] Daron Acemoglu. The simple macroeconomics of ai. Economic Policy, 40(121):13–58, 2024. doi:10.1093/epolic/eiae042.

[5] Erik Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, and Chad Syverson. The productivity j-curve: How intangibles complement general purpose technologies. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(1):333–372, 2021. doi:10.1257/mac.20180386.

[6] METR. Measuring the impact of early-2025 ai on experienced open-source developer productivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09089, 2025. URL https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/.

[7] Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, and Daniel Rock. Gpts are gpts: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10130, 2023.

[8] Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, 1991. ISBN 978-0262720212.

[9] David J. Deming. The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4):1593–1640, 2017. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx022.

[10] James J. Heckman and Tim Kautz. Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4):451–464, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014.

[11] Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Nicolas Papernot, Ross Anderson, and Yarin Gal. Ai models collapse when trained on recursively generated data. Nature, 631:755–759, 2024. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07566-y.

[12] Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Sylvain Viguier, and Anne-Laure Ligozat. Estimating the carbon footprint of bloom, a 176b parameter language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(253):1–15, 2023. arXiv:2211.02001.

[13] CISAC/PMP Strategy. Global economic study on ai impact on music and audiovisual creators. Technical report, CISAC, 2024. URL https://www.cisac.org/services/reports-and-research/cisacpmp-strategy-ai-study.

[14] Berklee College of Music. 2025 music production & engineering degree grid; guiding principles for ai/machine learning, 2025. URL https://www.berklee.edu/about/ai-machine-learning.

[15] USC Games. Program information and degree requirements, 2025. URL https://games.usc.edu/degrees. USC Institute for Creative Technologies, Game-If-AI Project.

[16] Culinary Institute of America. Bps in culinary arts catalog and program requirements, 2025. URL https://www.ciachef.edu/cia-undergraduate-programs/.

[17] Penn World Table. Penn world table, 2024. URL https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/. Version 10.0.

[18] O*NET OnLine. Occupational information network database v30.1, 2025. URL https://www.onetonline.org/.

[19] Harold L. Vogel. Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 10 edition, 2020. ISBN 978-1108489706.

[20] Newzoo. Global games market report. Technical report, Newzoo, Amsterdam, 2024. URL https://newzoo.com/resources/trend-reports/newzoo-global-games-market-report-2024-free-version.

[21] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Food demand analysis: Price elasticity estimates for food-away-from-home, 2024. URL https://www.ers.usda.gov/.

[22] McKinsey & Company. The state of ai in early 2024: Gen ai adoption spikes and starts to generate value, 2024. URL https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai.

[23] McKinsey & Company. The state of ai: How organizations are rewiring to capture value, 2025. URL https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai.

Downloads

Published

17-07-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Y. (2026). To Gen-AI or not to Gen-AI: Sensory-Economic Framework for Aligning Post-secondary Education with an AI-Transformed Labor Market. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 19(2), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.54097/2xxwdp57